![]() ![]() I'm more fascinated at the fact they can emulate these games on the Vita and run them so well. Roger Altizer Updated on SeptemReviewed by Jerrick Leger Tweet Share Email While all PlayStation 3 consoles can play original PlayStation discs, not all models are PlayStation 2 compatible. That's the thing, since they built it, they have access to all the documentation they will need to make a very good emulator, there's no need for them to reverse engineer anything. Sony having built it can reverse engineer it better Also as you said, their PS2 emulator only needs to work on specific systems, in this case the PS3. The PS2 game compatible PS3 20gb and 60gb models are 250+. They have access to all the PS2 documentation that no one else has access to and they're a big company that has a lot more money and manpower to spend on development than the PCSX2 dev team does. I really want to play Quake 3 Revolution 4 player split-screen on a PS3 without an emulator as its more powerful than a PS2 and I heard you need 8 to 25 times as powerful a machine to run an emulated game vs a non-emulated game. ![]() You basically answered your own question: The reason why Sony's PS2 emulation (same goes for Microsoft's Xbox 360 emulation) works so well is because Sony has a gigantic advantage in both information access and resources when compared to developers of unofficial emulators. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |